Saturday, May 11, 2013
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Module 5 Dynamic Technology
As I created my concept map on technology and media used in distance education, I realized that I am more comfortable on the static end of the continuum. However, I do know I will need to move towards the technology on the dynamic end of continuum. The dynamic end allows learners to interact with the content (Moller, 2008). The tools on this end of the continuum help involve “learners on a much deeper cognitive level” (2008, p. 1). To create a better distance educational experience, I know I will need to use these tools on the dynamic end so learners are exposed to activities that would allow them to interact with the content.
References
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Fahy, P. J. (2010). Characteristics of interactive online learning media. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 167-200).Edmonton, AB: AU Press.
Moller, L. (2008). Static and dynamic technological tools. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_2643771_1%26url%3D
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Saturday, April 13, 2013
Updated Storyboard for video assignment
Frame 1
|
Video a computer lab with children.
As educators, we are always looking for ways to bring
technology into the classroom. We ask
ourselves, how can our children get more out of this technology? How can students still be part of a
community while working on individual computers? What skills can we help develop in our
students when they are using technology?
(0:30)
|
Frame 2:
|
Today we are going to take an adventure to learn how
virtual worlds may help educators to overcome some of the challenges created
by the burgeoning technology of today.
.
What is a virtual world? According to Dass, Dabbagh, and Clark
(2011), “a virtual world is online, persistent, interactive environment by many users
simultaneously” (p. 96)
|
Frame3:
|
The growth of
Virtual worlds: The continuing growth of processing power
of PCs, increased bandwidth in residential communication, widespread use of
internet has allowed virtual worlds to move from the “trough of
dislliusinoment” to the “slope of enlightenment” (Wasko et. al, 2011, p. 645)
(Marcelino et. al, 2013). This growth
in technology has permitted people from all over the world to come together
and collaborate (2013)
(0:30)
|
Frame 4: Video different classrooms settings
|
As educators, we
know the traditional classroom setting has many benefits. Teachers can give direct instruction to
every student. Teachers can have
groups of students work together on problems.
Teachers can give individualized attention to students when
needed. Even with all we do as
teachers, it may not be enough to prepare our students for an unpredictable and
uncertain future (McGuigan et. al, 2012).
Virtual worlds
may provide a component to education that would help teachers narrow the gap
between the school setting and the real world.
|
Frame 5:
Kolb
|
The instructional
approach best related to virtual worlds is constructivism (Dass et. al, 2011).
Constructivism
theorists believe that learning is an active process where the learner
constructs knowledge rather than acquiring it (2011). The works of many of these theorists believe
that reflection is an important part of the learning process (Dickey,
2011).
|
Frame 6: Pictures of virtual world; clip of
someone using a virtual world
|
Virtual worlds
can provide a “safe” place for students to take risks. There are no material costs. Time does not become a problem (Dass et.
al, 2011).
Learners in
virtual worlds are not passive but are very active participates (Uzun &
Aydin, 2012). The avatar in the
environment allows students to have “sense of presence and awareness of
others, the ability to communicate and collaborate” (Dass et. al, 2011).
Not only can
students enter an already created world, but they also can create.
Virtual worlds can provide a “richer, more immersive experience”
(Wasko et al., 2011, p. 648). Many
users have stated that they lose track of time because of being so focused on
the task at hand (2011).
|
Frame: 7
|
We are entering into an age where generations of people will have
grown up never knowing a life without a computer, the internet, a mobile
phone, or virtual worlds (Wasko et. al, 2011). As educators, we need new methods that will
reach them (Marcelion et. al, 2013). Ask
yourself, can virtual worlds help you create a learning environment that will
prepare our students for their future?
In association with Sigve Virtual Environments, we welcome Scott
Merrick.
|
Frame: 8 Resources
|
|
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Module
3: Assessing Efforts
According to Dr. Siemans, finding new ways to assess
students is a difficult task (Laureate Education, n.d.). This is especially true for the growing
collaborative learning communities in education today. As educators, we would fail our students if
we did not include collaborative assessment (Marcinek, 2001). There are fewer professions today that rely
on individual competencies (2011). Instructors
need to change the assessment models they use (Laureate Education, n.d,).
Instructors need to move beyond mark-based assessments
(Laureate Education, n.d.). Marcinek
(2011) supplies several steps to help instructors create collaborative
assessment. The instructor should set
clear objectives, allow for open collaboration, access to resources, limit
explicit direction, and give clear expectations (2011). It is also important to teach students on how
to give each other meaningful feedback (Palloff & Pratt, 2005). The instructor also needs to be fair, direct,
and equitable (Laureate Education, n.d.).
Rubrics would also help students to know what is expected of them
(n.d.).
However, even with great planning and learning
outcomes, an instructor may come across a student who does not want to work
collaboratively. Clear guidelines for
participation need to be established (Palloff & Pratt, 2007). The instructor needs to become a
cheerleader. Discuss with the student
what is expected and explain how working collaboratively would be beneficial to
the student overall. Group members also
have responsibilities to one another (2007).
Group members can discuss amongst each other on what will be expected,
any limitations that may occur, and preferred styles of communication
(2007). If problems continue, then group
members should contact the instructor for guidance on how to handle the lack of
participation (2007).
Resources:
Laureate Education, Inc. (n.d). Assessment
of Collaborative Learning. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_2643771_1%26url%3D.
Marcinek,
A. (2011). Importance of Collaborative Assessment in a
21st Century Classroom. Retrieve from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/collaborative-assessment-digital-classroom-social-media-tools.
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating
online. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (2007). Building
online learning communities: Effective
strategies for the virtual classroom.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Storyboard for video
Title Slide: 1 Attention grabber
|
|
Title Slide: 2
|
How the growth of technology has changed the face of virtual worlds: clips from Second Life or other virtual
worlds
|
Title Slide: 3
|
Creation in virtual worlds
|
Title Slide: 4
|
Using virtual worlds
|
Title Slide:5
|
Virtual world environment compare to other learning environments
|
Title Slide:6
|
Using virtual worlds in K-12 education: would the benefits out way the negatives?
|
Title Slide: 7 Conclusion
|
Introduction of Keynote Speaker
|
Title Slide: 8 Resources
|
|
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Elements of Distance Education Diffusion
According
to Dr. Siemens (n.d.) in the Laureate Education video, the growth in technology
has given distance education a chance to become more accepted in today’s
corporate and educational realms. The area
in distance education that I believe has benefited the most is
communication. This has occurred because
of the growth of technology in communication tools such as webmail, chat rooms,
and instant messaging. These tools have allowed
people to communicate in new and profound ways.
These
communication tools have allowed people to not only connect asynchronously but
synchronously as well (Bilger, 2012).
Communication tools such as Skype, blogs, and even wikis have given people
new and exciting ways to work cooperatively (2012). Students can be more flexible not only in the
times they can set aside to study but also when they can work collaboratively
with other students (Sikkim Manipal University, 2012, a and b). Also the quality in these tools has improved
enough where people are becoming more comfortable using them when communicating
with other students (Laureate Education, n.d.)
In
the area of communication, distance education is helping students to enhance
their verbal and written skills as well (Sikkim Manipal University, 2012,
a). These skills arise from the need to
complete online correspondence, project work, research papers, and discussions
with fellow students (2012, a). These enhanced communications skills allow
students to not only interact with others but the content in a more diverse and
unique way.
Resources:
Bilger,
L. (2012). Distance education:
Collaborative blog. Retrieved
from http://lukebilger.blogspot.com/2011/12/distance-education-collaborative.html
Laureate Education, Inc. (n.d). The
future of distance education. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_2643771_1%26url%3D
Sikkim Manipal University (2012) Inculcating
effective communication through distance education. Retrieved from http://smude.edu.in/blog/distance-education/distance-education-promises-better-reach-through-information-and-communication-technology-ict
Sikkim Manipall University (2012).
Distance education promises
better reach through Information and Communication Technology ICT. Retrieved from http://smude.edu.in/blog/distance-education/distance-education-promises-better-reach-through-information-and-communication-technology-ict
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Module 1: The Next Generation of Distance Learning
Distance
education has the potential to change the face of education. In order to reach this potential, instructional
designers not only need to “evolve the field but also to assure that the
products of sound professional design practice lead the e-learning enterprise”
(Moller et al, 2008, p. 66, a). However,
I agree with Simonson’s (n.d.) statement that distance learning will not
replace traditional school. Traditional
schools are too ingrained into our society for it to ever be replaced. However, distance learning can provide new
opportunities that the traditional classroom cannot provide (Laureate Education,
n.d.). ,
Both
Moller et.al (2008, b) and Simonson (n.d.) believe that distance education
should not be identical to the traditional classroom. I do agree with their opinion in this
matter. As a teacher, I know that even
though all of my students need to meet the same learning goal or standard; I
cannot expect the same activities to work for every student in my class. I may have to use different activities to
help some of my students to reach that learning goal. My instruction for each student may not be
the same but it would be equivalent. This
equivalence provides a better education for all students involved.
Resources:
Laureate Education, Inc. (n.d). Principles of Distance
Education. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_2643771_1%26url%3D
Moller,
L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, May/June). The evolution of distance
education; Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 1: Training and Development). TechTrends, 52(3), 70-75.
Moller,
L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, July/August). The evolution of distance
education; Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher Education). TechTrends, 52(4), 70-75.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)