Eeny,
Meeny, Miny Moe, which learning theory is the best of all?
There is a multiple array of ideas and programs based on one
or more learning theory. Even though
each learning theory has valid ideas on how people learn, I have always felt
that one learning theory never truly explained how people learn. It seems I am not the only one who thinks
that each learning theory alone is not enough.
Karl Kapp (2007) states that educators must take the best from each and
use it to “create solid educational experiences” (paragraph 2). Katie Lepi (2012) posted an infographic to help
show how each learning
theory has a place in education, but all are needed to have a complete
learning theory.
Bill Kerr (2007) states learning theories have their place
in education. We cannot abandon the
learning theories just because of the weaknesses each may have (Kerr,
2007). Learning theories help to justify
big changes that need and should take place in the field of education (Kerr,
2007).
As an educator, how do I choose which learning theory best
meets my needs? Kapp (2007) describes some
activities that match each one.
Activities that require memorization, recognizing, or labeling would be
considered a behaviorist approach (Kapp, 2007).
Activities with a more cognitivism feel would include procedural or
rule-based learning while problem-solving would cater more toward
constructivism (2007).
References
Kerr, B. (2007, January
1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January
2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Lepi, K. (2012, December 12). A Simple Guide to 4 Complex Learning
Theories. Retrieved from http://www.edudemic.com/a-simple-guide-to-4-complex-learning-theories/